2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1966 Rover P5
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rover P5 would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 1966 Rover P5 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Ranger | P5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |