2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Mercury Brougham
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 1967 Mercury Brougham | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Ranger | Brougham |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 325 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |