2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 NSU Wankel Spider
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Wankel Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Wankel Spider would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1967 NSU Wankel Spider. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1967 NSU Wankel Spider. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 563 kg more than 1967 NSU Wankel Spider. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 NSU Wankel Spider. (74 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 NSU Wankel Spider.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 1967 NSU Wankel Spider | |
Make | Ford | NSU |
Model | Ranger | Wankel Spider |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 497 cc |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 74 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2020 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 34 L |