2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Pontiac Firebird (165 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Pontiac Firebird weights approximately 362 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 1967 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Ranger | Firebird |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 165 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2750 mm |