2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1975 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1975 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1975 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Holden Belmont weights approximately 27 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Holden Belmont. (228 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 1975 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | Belmont |
Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 228 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2830 mm |