2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1978 Mazda 929
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 228 kg more than 1978 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (134 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 1978 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ranger | 929 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 134 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |
