2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,315 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 265. (82 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 265. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 265 weights approximately 202 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 265. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 265.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | 265 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 58 L |