2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1981 Renault 9
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1981 Renault 9. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 392 kg more than 1981 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault 9. (139 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault 9.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 1981 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ranger | 9 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1721 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 906 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2490 mm |
