2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Holden Camira

To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1982 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 258 kg more than 1982 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Camira. (125 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Camira. 1982 Holden Camira has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Holden Camira will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: