2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Pontiac 6000
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Pontiac 6000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Pontiac 6000 would be higher.
Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Pontiac 6000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 1983 Pontiac 6000 | |
| Make | Ford | Pontiac |
| Model | Ranger | 6000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
