2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1986 Acura Integra
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Acura Integra would be higher.
Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 1986 Acura Integra | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Ranger | Integra |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 125 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |