2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1990 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 3,431 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1990 Toyota Land Cruiser. (97 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1990 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Because 1990 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Toyota Land Cruiser. (226 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 1990 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ranger | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 2000 | 1990 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3431 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 226 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |