2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT would be higher.
Because 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | 3000GT |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 221 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |