2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 113 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Ranger | 200 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1410 mm |
