2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher.
Because 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 1996 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Ranger | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 188 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |