2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Toyota Cresta
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Cresta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Cresta would be higher.
Because 1996 Toyota Cresta is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Cresta will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 1996 Toyota Cresta | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ranger | Cresta |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |