2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, both 2000 Ford Ranger and 2000 Holden HRT were released in the same year (2000). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 565 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Ranger. (250 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Ranger | HRT |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 815 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
