2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Ford Puma
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2002 Ford Puma. (100 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 263 kg more than 2002 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Puma. (146 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 2002 Ford Puma | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Puma |
Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 146 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |