2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ranger | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 157 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
