2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher. Both 2000 Ford Ranger and 2003 Renault Clio are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (177 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 193 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio.
Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (191 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 2003 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ranger | Clio |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |
