2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | Ranger | LS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 229 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
