2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 23 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (257 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Ranger. (250 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 257 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1275 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |