2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (197 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 87 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (222 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda RX-8. 2005 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1311 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 222 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |