2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Morgan 44

To start off, 2006 Morgan 44 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2006 Morgan 44. (115 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2006 Morgan 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 418 kg more than 2006 Morgan 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Morgan 44. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Morgan 44.

Compare all specifications: