2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2007 Mazda 6

To start off, 2007 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda 6 (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 178 kg more than 2007 Mazda 6.

Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda 6 (267 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Ranger. (250 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications: