2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Renault Clio weights approximately 182 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (151 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 2007 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ranger | Clio |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |
