2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Dodge Caliber
To start off, 2010 Dodge Caliber is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Caliber is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Caliber (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger.
Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Dodge Caliber. (191 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Dodge Caliber.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 2010 Dodge Caliber | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | Ranger | Caliber |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 191 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4415 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1534 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 51 L |