2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2011 BMW 330
To start off, 2011 BMW 330 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 BMW 330 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW 330 (256 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW 330 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW 330 (540 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Ranger. (250 Nm). This means 2011 BMW 330 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 2011 BMW 330 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | Ranger | 330 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 540 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4624 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 57 L |