2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Seat Exeo

To start off, 2012 Seat Exeo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2012 Seat Exeo. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2012 Seat Exeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Seat Exeo weights approximately 102 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger.

Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Seat Exeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Seat Exeo. (230 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Seat Exeo.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Ranger 2012 Seat Exeo
Make Ford Seat
Model Ranger Exeo
Year Released 2000 2012
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1798 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 135 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 250 Nm 230 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1298 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4661 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1772 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2642 mm