2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher.
Because 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Ranger | ESCALADE |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 397 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
