2000 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher.
Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Ranger | Cooper |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 121 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |