2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1948 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 401 more horse power than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1948 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1948 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford ST 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 1948 Jeep CJ3A | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | ST 460 | CJ3A |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2040 mm |
