2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1959 Triumph TR3
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 366 more horse power than 1959 Triumph TR3. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph TR3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 1959 Triumph TR3 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | ST 460 | TR3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2240 mm |