2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1964 Humber Super Snipe
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 332 more horse power than 1964 Humber Super Snipe. (128 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1964 Humber Super Snipe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Humber Super Snipe (226 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1964 Humber Super Snipe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 1964 Humber Super Snipe | |
Make | Ford | Humber |
Model | ST 460 | Super Snipe |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 226 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2800 mm |