2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1964 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 436 more horse power than 1964 Steyr Haflinger. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1964 Steyr Haflinger.
Because 1964 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford ST 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 1964 Steyr Haflinger | |
| Make | Ford | Steyr |
| Model | ST 460 | Haflinger |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 41 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 2840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 1510 mm |
