2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 352 more horse power than 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. (108 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 (194 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | |
Make | Ford | Willys-Overland |
Model | ST 460 | Aero-Willys 2600 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 194 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2740 mm |