2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1967 TVR Tuscan
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 TVR Tuscan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 TVR Tuscan would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 TVR Tuscan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1967 TVR Tuscan. (271 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1967 TVR Tuscan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 TVR Tuscan (426 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1967 TVR Tuscan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 1967 TVR Tuscan | |
| Make | Ford | TVR |
| Model | ST 460 | Tuscan |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 426 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2290 mm |
