2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1968 Simca 1100
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Simca 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Simca 1100 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 403 more horse power than 1968 Simca 1100. (57 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1968 Simca 1100.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Simca 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Simca 1100. (91 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Simca 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 1968 Simca 1100 | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | ST 460 | 1100 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1204 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 91 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2530 mm |
