2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1970 Triumph 1300
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 400 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 1300. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 1300.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Triumph 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 1970 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | ST 460 | 1300 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 99 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |