2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1974 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 360 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 1974 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | ST 460 | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 135 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2320 mm |