2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1975 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 310 more horse power than 1975 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1975 Datsun 280Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Datsun 280Z (221 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1975 Datsun 280Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 1975 Datsun 280Z | |
| Make | Ford | Datsun |
| Model | ST 460 | 280Z |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4399 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1631 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2304 mm |
