2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1978 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 434 more horse power than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford ST 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | ST 460 | LJ 50 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 539 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 1940 mm |
