2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1978 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 411 more horse power than 1978 Volkswagen Polo. (49 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1978 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volkswagen Polo. (77 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 1978 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | ST 460 | Polo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1093 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 77 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2340 mm |