2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1981 Seat Ronda
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 375 more horse power than 1981 Seat Ronda. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat Ronda.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat Ronda. (116 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 1981 Seat Ronda | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | ST 460 | Ronda |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |
