2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1984 Holden Camira
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Camira would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 349 more horse power than 1984 Holden Camira. (111 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Camira.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Camira. (125 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 1984 Holden Camira | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | ST 460 | Camira |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 125 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2580 mm |