2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1984 Triumph Acclaim
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Triumph Acclaim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Triumph Acclaim would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 310 more horse power than 1984 Triumph Acclaim. (150 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1984 Triumph Acclaim.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Triumph Acclaim, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Triumph Acclaim (245 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1984 Triumph Acclaim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 1984 Triumph Acclaim | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | ST 460 | Acclaim |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 245 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2330 mm |