2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1987 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 403 more horse power than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. (108 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 1987 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | ST 460 | Colt |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1795 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2390 mm |
