2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1992 Maserati Shamal
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Maserati Shamal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Maserati Shamal would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1992 Maserati Shamal. (321 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1992 Maserati Shamal.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Maserati Shamal (444 Nm) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1992 Maserati Shamal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 1992 Maserati Shamal | |
Make | Ford | Maserati |
Model | ST 460 | Shamal |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3217 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 444 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2520 mm |