2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1992 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur would be higher. At 6,748 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1992 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur. (301 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur (600 Nm) has 422 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1992 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 1992 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | ST 460 | Silver Spur |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 6748 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 600 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3170 mm |