2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1993 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 352 more horse power than 1993 Nissan Pulsar. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1993 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Nissan Pulsar. (148 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 1993 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | ST 460 | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2440 mm |
